Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 23 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Luv Bhardwaj vs. DCIT
The case was reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the assessee firm who filed his return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring the total income at Rs.42,50,930/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1) on 26.02…
K M V Industries vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-58(1), Delhi
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 31.03.2013. The assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 30.03.2015 at a total income of Rs. 10,07,610/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were …
Shri Abhimanyu Nath Vs. The I.T.O
The assessee, Shri Abhimanyu Nath, is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of garments through his proprietorship firm M/s. AZURE. The assessee filed his return of income for the year under consideration on 15.09.2012 declaring…
Kuldip Kumar Goel vs. ACIT (1)(1)
The appellant, Kuldip Kumar Goel, an individual, filed an original Income Tax Return for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring income of Rs. 30,85,160/-. The assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 17.03.2015 by accepting the return in…
RMP Holdings Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 13.09.2012 and the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 03.03.2015 at a total income of Rs 2,02,040/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were…
Shamim Ahmad Vs The I.T.O
The assessee, Shamim Ahmad, is engaged in the trading of livestock. He filed his return of income on 25.07.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 4,99,507/-. The case was reopened vide notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 and completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s…
Trimline Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Trimline Agencies Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring total income at Rs. 11,560/- and deemed total income u/s 115JB at Rs. 7,989/-. The return was processed, and the case was reopened with a notice …
V Mart Retails Ltd. Vs. ACIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata
The assessee company, V Mart Retails Ltd., filed its return of income on 13.08.2012 declaring a total income of Rs. 16,32,48,820/-. Subsequently, due to information received from the Investigation Wing indicating heavy transactions in the b…
AZAD SINGH VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1), SAHARANPUR UP
The assessee, Azad Singh, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2012-13. During the year, he made cash deposits totaling Rs. 27,45,500/- into his savings bank account at Punjab National Bank, Saharanpur. Based on these dep…
Sanjay vs. ITO, Ward-2
The assessee, Sanjay, deposited cash of Rs. 28,50,000/- in his bank account maintained with Corporation Bank, Rohtak during the Assessment Year 2012-13. Since the assessee failed to file the return of income under section 139(1), he was req…
ITA No. 3164/del/2023 SRS Advertising & marketing Pvt. ltd.
The Assessee, SRS Advertising & Marketing Private Limited, did not file the return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13. An assessment order was passed under sections 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 30/11/2019, computing the income …
Bholenath Foods Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Bholenath Foods Limited, is a private limited company engaged in trading food grains. It filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring an income of Rs.1,31,83,635/-. The case was selected for scrutiny…
Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala Vs. ITO, Ward-23(1)(6)
The assessee, Mr. Dhiren Pradip Sadiwala, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 declaring a total income of Rs. 7,55,020/-. A search and seizure action under section 132 of the Income Tax Act was carried out in the case…
Hindustan Construction Company Limited Vs. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax
Hindustan Construction Company Limited, a public listed company engaged in civil construction, filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 reporting a total loss. The case was selected for scrutiny, and an assessment order was passed. Subsequ…
Reachasia vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-29, Kolkata
The assessee, Reachasia, filed a return of income on 30.09.2012 declaring a total income of Rs.20,52,420/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 28.03.2014, a…
Umang Webtech Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Umang Webtech Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.09.2012, declaring a total income of ₹5,43,834/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 28.03.2019, which th…
Raju Mandol Vs. ITO, Ward-43(3), Kolkata
The assessee, Raju Mandol, is an individual who filed his return of income showing a total income of ₹40,120/- as income from business. The Revenue had information that the assessee was the proprietor of M/s. Shree Ganesh Enterprises and ha…
Paras Plaza Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(4), Kolkata
The assessee, Paras Plaza Pvt. Ltd., filed a return of income on 11.01.2013 declaring a total loss of ₹27,163/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 26.03.2019. The assessee filed a re…
Essen Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 9(1)
The assessee, Essen Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 14.09.2012, showing total income at ₹nil. The case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Act on 27.03.20…
DCIT, Circle-13(1), Kolkata vs. Century Aluminium MFG Company Ltd.
The assessee, Century Aluminium MFG Company Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring a loss of Rs. 3,67,08,876/-. The case was reopened by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on a statement…