Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 24 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
K M V Industries vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-58(1), Delhi
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 31.03.2013. The assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 30.03.2015 at a total income of Rs. 10,07,610/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were …
Park View Automotives P. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 19(3), Delhi
The assessee filed its return of income declaring income at Rs.728/- for AY 2012-13. The assessment was reopened based on information from the Investigation Wing about bogus entries amounting to Rs.1,62,40,000/- and Rs.13,60,000/-. The AO i…
Shri Abhimanyu Nath Vs. The I.T.O
The assessee, Shri Abhimanyu Nath, is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of garments through his proprietorship firm M/s. AZURE. The assessee filed his return of income for the year under consideration on 15.09.2012 declaring…
Kuldip Kumar Goel vs. ACIT (1)(1)
The appellant, Kuldip Kumar Goel, an individual, filed an original Income Tax Return for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring income of Rs. 30,85,160/-. The assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 17.03.2015 by accepting the return in…
RMP Holdings Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 13.09.2012 and the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 03.03.2015 at a total income of Rs 2,02,040/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were…
Shamim Ahmad Vs The I.T.O
The assessee, Shamim Ahmad, is engaged in the trading of livestock. He filed his return of income on 25.07.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 4,99,507/-. The case was reopened vide notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 and completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s…
Ojas Impex Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer-19(1)
The assessee, Ojas Impex Private Limited, received Rs.50 lakhs from M/s Divyadrishti Merchants Pvt. Ltd., which was treated as unexplained income and added back under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer received in…
Jugal Kishor Pradhan vs ITO
The assessee, Jugal Kishor Pradhan, is in the business of trading iron and steel scrap. He filed his original return of income on 27/08/2012 and subsequently filed a return of income on receipt of notice u/s 148 of the Act declaring a total…
AZAD SINGH VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(3)(1), SAHARANPUR UP
The assessee, Azad Singh, did not file a return of income for the assessment year 2012-13. During the year, he made cash deposits totaling Rs. 27,45,500/- into his savings bank account at Punjab National Bank, Saharanpur. Based on these dep…
Sanjay vs. ITO, Ward-2
The assessee, Sanjay, deposited cash of Rs. 28,50,000/- in his bank account maintained with Corporation Bank, Rohtak during the Assessment Year 2012-13. Since the assessee failed to file the return of income under section 139(1), he was req…
ITA No. 3164/del/2023 SRS Advertising & marketing Pvt. ltd.
The Assessee, SRS Advertising & Marketing Private Limited, did not file the return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13. An assessment order was passed under sections 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 30/11/2019, computing the income …
Mukesh Kumar Vs National Faceless Appeal Centre
The appellant assessee, Mukesh Kumar, is an individual who was in the business of running cabs. He filed his Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 18.04.2013, declaring an income of Rs.9,20,934/-. The learned Assessing Officer…
Gaurav Dhir Vs. Income Tax Officer
This appeal pertains to the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee, Gaurav Dhir, has appealed against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], Nashik, dated 31.10.2025. The case involves proceedings un…
Bholenath Foods Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Bholenath Foods Limited, is a private limited company engaged in trading food grains. It filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring an income of Rs.1,31,83,635/-. The case was selected for scrutiny…
Hindustan Construction Company Limited Vs. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax
Hindustan Construction Company Limited, a public listed company engaged in civil construction, filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 reporting a total loss. The case was selected for scrutiny, and an assessment order was passed. Subsequ…
Reachasia vs. DCIT/ACIT, Circle-29, Kolkata
The assessee, Reachasia, filed a return of income on 30.09.2012 declaring a total income of Rs.20,52,420/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the assessment was framed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 28.03.2014, a…
Umang Webtech Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee, Umang Webtech Private Limited, filed its return of income on 30.09.2012, declaring a total income of ₹5,43,834/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 28.03.2019, which th…
Paras Plaza Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(4), Kolkata
The assessee, Paras Plaza Pvt. Ltd., filed a return of income on 11.01.2013 declaring a total loss of ₹27,163/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 26.03.2019. The assessee filed a re…
M/s Thirani Securities Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer
The case involves M/s Thirani Securities Private Limited, which had its assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 25.03.2015. The assessment was subsequently reopened under section 147 of the Act on 27.03.2019 a…
Essen Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 9(1)
The assessee, Essen Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 14.09.2012, showing total income at ₹nil. The case of the assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Act on 27.03.20…