Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–20 of 132 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
Sanjeev Bhardwaj vs ACIT
The assessee filed his return of income on 18.05.2019, declaring total income of INR 381,54,310/-. During the assessment proceedings, AO observed that assessee has received funds from M/s Oxygen Projects Pvt. Ltd. of INR 50,00,000/-. After …
Anupma Bidra vs Income Tax Officer, G Budh Nagar
The assessee, Anupma Bidra, deposited cash amounting to Rs. 27,00,000/- in her savings bank account and sold an immovable property for Rs. 72,35,000/- during F.Y. 2011-12. The Assessing Officer issued notices to examine the source of cash a…
Luv Bhardwaj vs. DCIT
The case was reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the assessee firm who filed his return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring the total income at Rs.42,50,930/-. The return was processed under Section 143(1) on 26.02…
Shiv Shakti Handicrafts Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO
The assessee company, Shiv Shakti Handicrafts Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for AY 2012-13 declaring income of INR 12,85,810/-. A search and seizure operation was carried out in the case of Tirupati Sunworld Group of companies on 11…
K M V Industries vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-58(1), Delhi
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 31.03.2013. The assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 30.03.2015 at a total income of Rs. 10,07,610/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were …
Pankaj Gupta Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Faridabad, Harayan 121002
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an assessment under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, adding Rs.12,78,000/- on account of undisclosed sources for making cash deposits in the bank. The assessee filed an appeal be…
Jagram Manesar vs. Assessing Officer, Gurugram
The assessee, Jagram Manesar, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC dated 19.05.2025 for A.Y. 2012-13, which sustained an addition of Rs.37,99,000/- made towards undisclosed income in respect…
Ashok Gupta vs. Ward 52 (5)
The appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 30.10.2025 for A.Y. 2012-13 in sustaining the addition made by the AO in respect of undisclosed interest income earned i…
NAVYUG TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ITO, WARD 18(2)
The appeal by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi-6/10768/2019-20 dated 2.8.2024. The assessment was framed by the ITO, Ward 18(2), New Delhi u/s. 143(3)/…
Rohit Manchanda Vs. ITO
The Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on information that the assessee had sold an immovable property for Rs.1.83 crores during the financial year 2011-12 related to assessment year 2012-13. The asses…
Braham Prakash vs Income Tax Officer
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1078546788(1) dated 16.07.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The delay of …
Raghav Aditya Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, Circle-13
The appeal is preferred by the assessee against the orders dated 21.02.2018, by Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2012-13. None appeared from the assessee side, therefore, the Tribunal decided to proce…
Sh. Sunder Lal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-68(8), New Delhi
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059165095(1), dated …
RMP Holdings Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer
The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 13.09.2012 and the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 03.03.2015 at a total income of Rs 2,02,040/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were…
Shamim Ahmad Vs The I.T.O
The assessee, Shamim Ahmad, is engaged in the trading of livestock. He filed his return of income on 25.07.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 4,99,507/-. The case was reopened vide notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 and completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s…
Lime Fresh Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. I.T.O., Ward - 3(1)
The assessee, Lime Fresh Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 29.09.2012, declaring a total income of ₹2,62,465/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and various notices and questionnaires were issued by the Assessing Office…
Techno Teaching Infosolution Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(2), Kolkata
The assessee, Techno Teaching Infosolution Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring total income at Nil and subsequently filed a revised return also declaring total income at Nil. The case was selected for…
Piyush Suppliers Pvt. ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(3)
The assessee, Piyush Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 29.09.2012, declaring a total loss of ₹54,478 for the assessment year 2012-13. The case was selected for scrutiny, and statutory notices were issued. The Assessing Offi…
Pushpmala Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-9(3), Kolkata
The case involves Pushpmala Distributors Pvt. Ltd. for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee filed a return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 5,400/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and notices under section 143(2) were iss…
Ravilochanah Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Wad 4(1)
The assessee, Ravilochanah Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 08.09.2012, declaring a total income of ₹427. The return was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) due to the large share premi…