Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 2140 of 125 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Ras Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer, Ward -59(2), New Delhi-110001

ITA No. 168/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘SMC’, New Delhi10 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083399002(1) dated 08.12.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessin

Read summary

Sh. Sunder Lal vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-68(8), New Delhi

ITA No.119/Del/2026Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench9 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059165095(1), dated

Read summary

DCIT, Circle 4 (2), vs. Cyberwalk Tech Park Pvt. Ltd.

ITA No.448/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal6 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The Revenue has filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi-31 dated 25.11.2024 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee was allotted land measuring 38212 sq mtrs. in Manesar by HSIIDC f

Read summary

Kuldip Kumar Goel vs. ACIT (1)(1)

ITA No.3285/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi6 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The appellant, Kuldip Kumar Goel, an individual, filed an original Income Tax Return for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring income of Rs. 30,85,160/-. The assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 17.03.2015 by accepting the return in

Read summary

Income Tax Officer, New Delhi vs. Uday Kumar

ITA No.4254/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench6 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee, Uday Kumar, is an individual and non-filer of return of income. The department alleges that the assessee received Rs.59,18,00,000/- from 636 investors of M/s Aurochem Buildprop Private Limited (ABPL) and neither gave property

Read summary

DCIT vs Rajan Kumar

ITA No. 130/Del/2025 (AY 2012-13)Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi6 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee, Rajan Kumar, is an individual running a proprietorship firm under the name of 'M/s Shipra Engineers and Consultants'. He filed a return of income on 21-03-2013 declaring total income at Rs. 42,50,268/-. The case was selected f

Read summary

Ajay Kumar vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 8354/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘SMC’, New Delhi4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080135440(1) dated 28.08.2025, in proceedings u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Both the learned lower aut

Read summary

RMP Holdings Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.4592/Del/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B'4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee filed its return of income declaring total income on 13.09.2012 and the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) vide order dated 03.03.2015 at a total income of Rs 2,02,040/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were

Read summary

Shri Narender Singh Vs The I.T.O

ITA No. 4099/DEL/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi 'G' Bench4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The AO received information that the assessee made cash deposits amounting to Rs.52,30,000/- in a State Bank of India account. The AO found that the assessee did not file any ITR for A.Y. 2012-13 and did not offer any explanation regarding

Read summary

Shamim Ahmad Vs The I.T.O

ITA No. 4241/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ‘G’ Bench4 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee, Shamim Ahmad, is engaged in the trading of livestock. He filed his return of income on 25.07.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 4,99,507/-. The case was reopened vide notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2019 and completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s

Read summary

Ojas Impex Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer-19(1)

ITA No.3802/DEL/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench2 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

The assessee, Ojas Impex Private Limited, received Rs.50 lakhs from M/s Divyadrishti Merchants Pvt. Ltd., which was treated as unexplained income and added back under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer received in

Read summary

Shri Parasnath Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle-2, Muzaffarnagar

ITA No. 3673/Del/2023Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches ‘F’, New Delhi28 Mar 2025

The assessee’s case was reopened by the Assessing Officer on receiving information from the D.G., Central Excise Intelligence that the assessee company had evaded union excise duty on account of clandestine sale of MS ingots. Originally, as

Read summary

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-77(1) Vs M/s Sikka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

ITA No.2495/Del/2022Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, ‘G’: New Delhi28 Mar 2025

The assessee, M/s Sikka Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, participated in the tender for allotment of Group housing plots of New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings

Read summary

SURESH CHAND VS. ITO, WARD 2(3)(2)

ITA No. 5751/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI)27 Mar 2025

This appeal has been filed by the Assessee, Suresh Chand, against the order dated 12.09.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi relating to assessment year 2012-13. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issue of notice, henc

Read summary

Viccky Bhalla Vs Income Tax Officer

ITA No. 4292/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘E’, New Delhi27 Mar 2025

The case pertains to the appeal filed by Viccky Bhalla for Assessment Year 2012-13 against the order of the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 24.07.2024. The appeal arises under sections 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The

Read summary

Maharaja Agarsain Private Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-16(2), New Delhi

ITA No.3967/Del/2024Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench: ‘E’ New Delhi27 Mar 2025

This appeal pertains to the assessment year 2012-13 and arises against the order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi in case no. 10241/2019-20. The proceedings are under section 147/143(3) of th

Read summary

Sarens Heavy Lift India Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT

ITA No.2702/Del/2019Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi 'G' Bench, New Delhi26 Mar 2025

The case involves an appeal filed by Sarens Heavy Lift India Pvt. Ltd. against the imposition of a penalty of INR 13,61,930/- under section 271AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXV, New Delhi. The pe

Read summary

SURENDER VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4, SONIPT, HARYANA

ITA NO. 5720/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH25 Mar 2025

The assessee, Surender, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Addl/JCIT9A)-5, Delhi dated 30.05.2024, relating to the assessment year 2012-13. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issuance of a notice for hearing. The

Read summary

JIT PAL SINGH Vs. Ward2(2), Gurgaon.

ITA No:-4049/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: ‘C’: NEW DELHI)25 Mar 2025

The appellant, JIT PAL SINGH, deposited cash amounting to Rs. 20,00,000/- into his bank account during the Financial Year 2011-12, instead of the alleged amount of Rs. 31,00,000/-. The appellant did not file a return of income for the relev

Read summary

KAMAL SINGH VS. ACIT CIRCLE-14(1)

ITA NO. 2891/Del/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “C”25 Mar 2025

The assessee, Kamal Singh, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. NFAC, Delhi dated 26.09.2023, relating to assessment year 2012-13. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the issue of notice for hearing. The assessee claimed

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning