Browse Tax Judgements
Showing 1–16 of 16 judgements · Browse by section & bench
Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.
BHARAT GUPTA vs. ITO, WARD-72(4)
The assessee filed his return of income on 29.3.2012 declaring an income of Rs. 2,17,100/-. AO noted that the information was received from ADIT(Inv), Unit-1(3), Mumbai vide office letter No. ADIT(Inv.)/Unit-1(3)/Diss./DMC EDU/2017-18/5 dat…
Asok Kumar S/o sher Singh vs. ITO
The assessee, Asok Kumar S/o sher Singh, filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 02.06.2025 for A.Y. 2011-12, challenging the addition of Rs.4,80,8000/- towards unexplained income …
FOOD RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CENTRE vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), NEW DELHI
The assessee, FOOD RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CENTRE, did not file its return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 in compliance with a notice under section 148 of the Act. The assessee submitted that its name was changed in August 2008 to …
The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-18, Jhandewalan, New Delhi-110055. Vs. M/s Adish Estates Pvt. Ltd., A-46, FF, Double Story, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008.
A search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was conducted in Aerens Group. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from the Investigation Wing that the assessee had transacted in immovable property. To ascertain the fair …
Raj Kumar Sharma vs. ITO, Ward 32 (5)
The assessee, Raj Kumar Sharma, an individual, did not file the return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee had cash deposits of Rs.5,80,…
Seema Puri Vs. ITO
The case involves an appeal by the assessee, Seema Puri, against the order of the Ld. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bhubaneshwar, for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee filed an appeal on several grounds, primarily…
Jaipal Vs. ITO
The case involves an assessment order passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 22/03/2016, where the Assessing Officer made certain additions and computed the income of the assessee at Rs. 80,56,680/-. The assessee had filed…
Kalpana Nitin Shah Vs. ITO 19(2)(2)
The assessee, Kalpana Nitin Shah, did not file her return of income for the relevant year. Information in the NMS Module indicated that she sold an immovable property for Rs. 55,00,000/- during AY 2011-12. Since no ITR was filed within the …
Apurva Mukesh Thakkar Vs. ITO Ward 41(2)(1) Mumbai
The assessee, Apurva Mukesh Thakkar, is an individual who was carrying on business as a proprietor of M/s Bhavana Televentures during the relevant previous year. He did not file a return of income under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act,…
M/s Parama Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 2(3)
The assessee, M/s Parama Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income on 16.03.2012 declaring a total income of ₹77,360/-. The case was reopened under section 147 of the Act by issuing a notice under section 148 on 30.03.2016. The ass…
M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(3), Kolkata
The assessee, M/s Muse Advertising And Media Private Limited, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 declaring a total income of Rs.3,750/-. The case was originally assessed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961…
Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Kolkata Vs. Anushreya Investment Private Limited
The assessee, Anushreya Investment Private Limited, filed its return of income on 16-9-2011 declaring an income of Rs. 1,49,290/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under Section 147 of the Act, and a notice was issued on 27-3-2018. The As…
Debasis Mukhopadhyay vs. Income Tax Officer
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the case of the assessee, Debasis Mukhopadhyay, under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by issuing a notice under Section 148 on 26.03.2008, following information that the assessee had booked bogus…
M/s Jamiya Arabiya Nafe Ul Uloom Education Society vs Income-tax Officer, (Exemption) Ward, Ghaziabad
The assessee, M/s Jamiya Arabiya Nafe Ul Uloom Education Society, a registered society and 'madarsa', received a cash deposit of Rs. 38,34,097/- in Allahabad Bank, Kolkata main branch. No return of income was filed by the assessee. The Inco…
Jagbir Singh vs ITO
The assessee, Jagbir Singh, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 electronically on 07.07.2011, which was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information from …
Parvinder Kaur Sawhney vs. Pr.CIT, Delhi – 12
The assessee, Parvinder Kaur Sawhney, did not file an income tax return for the Assessment Year 2011-12. A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued, but the assessee did not respond. Consequently, the assessment was c…