Skip to main content

Browse Tax Judgements

Showing 18 of 8 judgements · Browse by section & bench

“Ask” finds judgements by meaning — try can amortisation of goodwill be treated as an operating expense?

Free to read — no signup required. Every judgement includes the facts, legal issues, outcome and related cases. Create a free account for AI chat, drafting and workspaces.

Satbir Mahato Vs. ITO, Ward 24(3)

ITA No.1155/KOL/2023INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ B” BENCH, KOLKATA17 Mar 2025

The assessee, Satbir Mahato, filed a return of income declaring a total income of ₹18,600/-. His case was reopened under section 147 of the Act due to large cash deposits into his bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices and

Read summary

Jaspal Singh and Sons HUF Vs. ITO, Ward 50(3)

ITA No. 3324/DEL/2023INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH7 Mar 2025

The assessee, Jaspal Singh and Sons HUF, filed a return of income for the assessment year 2009-10 declaring nil income. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the act. Subsequently, based on information from the investigation wing

Read summary

Rakesh Divedi vs. Income Tax Officer

ITA No.3290/Del/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH ‘E’9 Jan 2026

The assessee, Rakesh Divedi, is an individual and proprietor of M/s Triambkay Gauri Impex. The Income Tax Officer received information from the Investigation Wing about cash deposits in the assessee's ICICI Bank account that did not commens

Read summary

Samudra Commotrade (P) Ltd. Vs. A.O., NFAC, New Delhi

ITA No.: 1057/KOL/2023INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH15 Jan 2026

The assessee, Samudra Commotrade (P) Ltd., had its assessment completed under sections 147/143(3)/144/263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 31.03.2016. An addition of ₹9,97,50,000/- was made on account of unexplained cash credit, assessing th

Read summary

Ramkumar Venugopal Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, Central Circle-8(1)

ITA No. 7047/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai “D” Bench12 Jan 2026

The assessment was completed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act by order dated 20-12-2016, where the Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax a sum of Rs. 66,43,847/- on account of bogus losses claimed by the assessee due to

Read summary

Niraj Pravinchandra Doshi Vs ITO,Ward-19(2)(4), Mumbai

ITA No. 4415/MUM/2025INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SMC BENCH, MUMBAI20 Jan 2026

The assessee, Niraj Pravinchandra Doshi, a trader of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, had his case reopened based on information from DGIT (Inv.) alleging that he was a beneficiary of bogus purchases from six parties. The purchases from thes

Read summary

Apar Lubricant Ltd. vs. DCIT 14(1)(1), Mumbai

ITA No.7360/Mum/2025Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ Bench, Mumbai27 Jan 2026

The assessee, Apar Lubricant Ltd., is engaged in the business of marketing lubricants and allied products. For the relevant year, it had debited an amount of Rs. 1,41,01,455/- under the head 'Advertising, publicity and sales promotion expen

Read summary

Sumangal Jewels Private Limited vs. DCIT, Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata

I.T.A. No.2357/Kol/2024INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, KOLKATA16 Dec 2025

The facts in brief are that the search and seizure action as well as survey operation were conducted on 01.12.2025 on Bhalotia Group of Companies as well as residential premises of Director/partners at different places at Raniganj, Asansol,

Read summary
Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning