Skip to main content

Yunush Mallick Vs ITO, Ward-61(3), Kolkata

Case No: ITA No.1990/KOL/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC Bench, Kolkata
Date: 11/4/2025

Parties Involved

appellantYunush Mallick
respondentITO, Ward-61(3), Kolkata

Facts Summary

The assessee, Yunush Mallick, filed the original return of income for the assessment year 2017-2018. The Department noticed that the assessee had purchased an immovable property at a price lower than the fair market value. Consequently, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under Section 147 and completed it ex parte under Section 144, adding ₹10,75,000 as unexplained investment and ₹26,01,610 as income from other sources. The CIT(A) deleted the addition of ₹10,75,000 but sustained the a

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the addition of ₹10,75,000 as unexplained investment is valid.
  • 2. Whether the addition of ₹26,01,610 as income from other sources is valid.

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Yunush Mallick Vs ITO, Ward-61(3), Kolkata - Opakhya | Opakhya