Skip to main content

Youth Brigade Charitable Trust, Bengaluru vs. CIT (Exemptions)

Case No: ITA No. 707/Bang/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore
Date: 24 Sep 2026

Parties Involved

appellantYouth Brigade Charitable Trust
respondentCIT (Exemptions)

Facts Summary

The assessee, Youth Brigade Charitable Trust, was granted provisional registration by Order in Form No.10AC dated 23.01.2023 under sub-clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Act. The trust subsequently filed an application in Form No.10AB on 08.12.2023 seeking regular (Permanent) registration u/s 12AB of the Act, which was rejected by the CIT (Exemptions) on 11.06.2024. The assessee then filed another application on 25.04.2025, which was also rejected by the CIT (Exemptions) on the ground that the earlier rejection order had attained finality and the present application was not maintainable and void ab initio.…

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the CIT (Exemptions) erred in law and on facts in rejecting the application for registration under section 12AB as 'not maintainable' solely on the ground that an earlier rejection order was not appealed.
  • 2. Whether the CIT (Exemptions) failed to appreciate that the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not prohibit filing of a fresh application under section 12AB merely because an earlier application was rejected and not appealed against.
  • 3. Whether the CIT (Exemptions) erred in holding that the earlier rejection order had attained finality and therefore the present application is void ab initio, when the Act does not provide any such bar or restriction in registration proceedings under section 12AB.
  • 4. Whether the Rejection order is bad in law as the CIT (Exemptions) has mechanically rejected the application without conducting the mandatory enquiry as contemplated under section 12AB(1)(b)(i) and without recording satisfaction or dissatisfaction on the genuineness of activities.
  • 5. Whether the learned CIT (Exemptions) erred in law and on facts in refusing to consider the fresh application for registration, despite there being no statutory bar under the Income-tax Act, 1961 against filing a subsequent application, particularly when the earlier application was not disposed of on merits.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1•Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning