Yogesh Maganlal Chawda v/s Income Tax Officer
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Yogesh Maganlal Chawda, has not filed any return of income for the assessment year 2015-16. The Assessing Officer re-opened the assessee's case due to significant financial transactions during the year, including cash deposits worth ₹17,80,000, payment for the transfer of immovable property worth ₹3,00,000, and salary income of ₹30,00,000. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was served on the assessee. However, no return of income was filed in response to the notice. The Assessing Officer assessed the income of the assessee at ₹3,47,80,000. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which was dismissed. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Assessing Officer is justified in passing an order making an addition of Rs.3,47,80,000/- without proper service of notice and against the principle of natural justice.
- 2. Whether the Assessing Officer is justified in passing an order making an addition of Rs.17,80,000/- as unexplained money under Sec 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- 3. Whether the Assessing Officer is justified in passing an order making an addition of Rs.30,00,000/- as salary income.
- 4. Whether the Assessing Officer is justified in passing an order making an addition of Rs.3,00,00,000/- as unexplained investment under Sec. 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- 5. Whether the Assessing Officer is justified in passing an order in breach of principle of natural justice.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
3 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
ITA No. 5916/DEL/2025; Assessment Year: 2016-17
DELHI GUJARAT FLEET CARRIERS VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1)
Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2021-22Partly AllowedRamesh Deora vs. DCIT
D Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2016-17AllowedRahul Khaitan vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, New Delhi
Delhi Bench benchAY 2015-16AllowedM/s Chandra Co-operative Group Housing Society Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3), Gurgaon, Haryana
Delhi Bench ‘G’, New Delhi benchAY 2012-13Partly AllowedShri Rajesh Dineshbhai Solanki vs. The Income Tax Officer
Rajkot bench