Skip to main content

Vinita Jagdesh Aswani Vs ITO

Case No: ITA No. 0037/PUN/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune
Date: 1 Oct 2024

Parties Involved

appellantVinita Jagdesh Aswani
respondentThe Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Pune

Facts Summary

Vinita Jagdesh Aswani, an individual identified as a non-filer, deposited a large amount of specified bank notes/cash into her bank account. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-8(1), Pune, issued a notice under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, calling upon her to furnish a return of income. As she did not file the return within the time limit, her return was turned down. The AO rejected the assessee's books and framed the assessment under section 144 of the Act, treating the entire specified bank notes deposits as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Act and brought the same to tax under section 115BBE of the Act. The assessee appealed against the rejection of her books and the determination of income, but the National Faceless Appeal Centre dismissed the appeal ex-parte. The assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme but did not pay the disputed taxes. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune, allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remitted the file to the NFAC for de-novo adjudication.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Ex-parte dismissal of appeal by NFAC
  • 2. Rejection of books and determination of income

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning