Vikesh Sampat Jain vs. ITO, Ward-6(1), Pune

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Vikesh Sampat Jain, is an individual engaged in the business of wholesale trading of electrical and electronic goods. The assessee filed a return of income for the assessment year 2015-16, declaring a taxable income of Rs.8,18,490/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had shown an amount of Rs.1,08,42,000/- as unsecured loans received from various persons. The Assessing Officer accepted some of these loans and confirmed others, leading to an assessed income of Rs.54,68,490/-. The assessee appealed against this order, arguing that the Assessing Officer had not considered the evidence provided and had erred in confirming the additions. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and directing the Assessing Officer to verify the facts and decide the issue afresh.…

Legal Issues

• 1. The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the assessed income at Rs. 54,68,490/- as against the returned income of Rs. 8,18,490/-
• 2. The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming addition of Rs.6,50,000/- in respect of loan availed by Assessee from Mr. Sampatraj P Jain without considering the facts of the case
• 3. The learned CIT has erred in confirming additions of Rs.40,00,000/- in respect of loan availed by Assessee from Mr. Sampatraj P Jain (HUF) without considering the facts of the case

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Devinder Ajmani Vs. Assessing Officer, Ward-11(1)

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(1), Ahmedabad Vs Puroshottambhai Bachubhai Pitroda

  Ahmedabad bench

• JCIT (OSD) in charge of DCIT, Circle-1(3)(1), Mumbai Vs. Geopreneur Realty Private Limited

  Mumbai benchAY 2018-19Dismissed

• Anil Kr. Jain vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench 'B', New Delhi benchAY 2013-14Allowed

• Revenue vs. Manju Diamonds Pvt. Ltd.

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Amigo Finstock Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO

  Ahmedabad bench