Toyo Ink India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the DCIT
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appeal is filed by Toyo Ink India Private Limited challenging the Final Assessment Order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) and Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 23/07/2024 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2020-21. The Assessee contends that the Final Assessment Order is time-barred by limitation and is bad in law as it has been passed beyond the time frame prescribed under Section 153(1) read with Section 153(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee relies on the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Roca Bathroom Products (P.) Ltd. and orders passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench. The Department's Representative argues that the issue of limitation arising from the interplay between Section 144C and Section 153 of the Act is presently unsettled and pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, thus seeking deferral of adjudication of the present Appeal and the issue of limitation.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the Final Assessment Order passed by the Assessing Officer is time-barred by limitation under Section 153(1) read with Section 153(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
4 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Wabtec Locomotive Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2020-21AllowedBentley Systeme India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2020-21AllowedDnata International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2020-21AllowedLonza India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2020-21AllowedAhresty India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2014-15AllowedPersolkelly India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT
Delhi Bench ‘H’ New Delhi benchAY 2020-21Allowed