Skip to main content

The Sankheda Jetput Pavi Taluka Ginning Pressing Cotton Sale Co.op. Society Ltd. vs. PCIT

Case No: ITA No. 397/Ahd/2020
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD
Date: 9 Oct 2024

Parties Involved

appellantThe Sankheda Jetput Pavi Taluka Ginning Pressing Cotton Sale Co.op. Society Ltd.
respondentPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Vadodara

Facts Summary

The assessee, a cooperative society engaged in ginning and pressing raw cotton, filed a return of income on September 29, 2015, declaring a total income of Rs. NIL. The assessment for this return was selected for limited scrutiny under the CASS framework. Consequently, the assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act was completed on August 30, 2017, where the returned income of Rs. NIL was accepted without further adjustments. However, upon reviewing the assessment records, Principal CIT was of the view that the assessment order was both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. A show-cause notice under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act was issued on November 1, 2019, which highlighted several points. Firstly, it referred to the society's annual report for the year 2014-15, which indicated that the assessee dealt with various entities, including The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. and several private businesses. Furthermore, it was noted that the society had invested in fully automatic machinery to enhance its competitiveness against private ginning companies. This raised questions regarding compliance with Section 80(P)(2)(V) of the Act, which stipulates that processing must be conducted without the aid of power using members' agricultural produce. The examination of records of the assessee also revealed that the assessee engaged in job work for private companies, leading to TDS deductions by these companies, which were subsequently claimed by the as…

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(v) of Rs. 53,53,310/- for ginning and pressing activity.
  • 2. Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(e) of the Act.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1•Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning