Super Fin Services, D 1-2, West Gate, Nr. YMCA Club, S.G. Road, Ahmedabad Vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(3)(5) Ahmedabad
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Super Fin Services, filed returns of income for the assessment years 2020-21 and 2021-22, admitting total incomes of Rs. 99,55,096/- and Rs. 1,11,40,310/- respectively. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CPC) determined the assessable income at Rs. 1,14,55,096/- and Rs. 1,19,40,320/- respectively. The assessee filed rectification petitions for both assessment years, but the rectification orders did not change the assessed income. Consequently, the assessee filed appeals against the rectification orders. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeals, holding that the rectification orders were based on the information uploaded by the assessee and there was no mistake on the part of the CPC. The assessee then filed appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the order passed by the Ld. CIT (A) is against law, equity & natural justice.
- 2. Whether the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts on upholding order of Ld AO for disallowing remuneration to partner to the extent of Rs.15,00,000/- under section 40(b) of the Act.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Indian Forest Industries P. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-12(1)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19AllowedDy. CIT, Circle 4(1) Vs. Tide Water Oil Co. (India) Ltd.
Kolkata benchAY 2015-16DismissedPOOJA GUPTA VS. ITO, WARD 52(1), CH. 206-207, ANSAL SATYAM, NOIDA
Delhi Bench ‘F’ benchAY 2016-17DismissedITA No.2395/CHNY/2025
Unicorn Dealtrade Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CPC, Bengaluru
Kolkata 'SMC' Bench benchAY 2013-14Partly AllowedVanshika Motors (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT
Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi benchAY 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11Allowed