Sunny Walia Vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Sunny Walia, filed an appeal against the imposition of a penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging non-compliance with section 44AB (tax audit report filing). The total value of transactions in the derivative segment was Rs.46,55,36,733/-. The assessee contended that the Revenue authority incorrectly considered the total sale proceeds as turnover, whereas, according to the Guidance Note of Tax Audit under section 44AB issued by ICAI, turnover in speculation business should be reckoned as the positive or negative difference for independent transactions, which amounted to Rs.12.58 lakhs.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the turnover for the purposes of section 44AB should be considered as the total sale proceeds or the positive/negative difference for independent transactions.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Savitha Gas Agency vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corp Ward-8(2), Chennai

• M/s Nirvana Nest Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-14

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Juginder Singh Wadhwa Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 67(1), New Delhi

• Abhishek Kumar Prasad vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Siliguri

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Uday G. Andanimath vs. The Income Tax Officer

  Bangalore benchAY 2017-18Dismissed

• Shri. Kumaraswamy Gangadharaiah Kallur Vs. DCIT

  Bangalore benchAY 2014-15Allowed