Skip to main content

Subbiah Murugavel Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Tirunelveli

Case No: ITA No.2689/Chny/2025
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘D’ Bench: Chennai
Date: 1/23/2026

Parties Involved

appellantSubbiah Murugavel
respondentThe Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Tirunelveli

Facts Summary

The assessee, Subbiah Murugavel, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring a total income of Rs.4,48,140. The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee had introduced capital assets worth Rs.22,10,40,000 into the partnership firm M/s.APP Travels during the year under consideration. Consequently, the AO reopened the assessment by issuing a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 19.04.2022. The assessee filed a return declaring the same income, but th

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Validity of the notice issued under section 148 beyond the period of 3 years.

Precedents Relied Upon

4 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Subbiah Murugavel Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Tirunelveli - Opakhya | Opakhya