Sriyans Enterprises Limited Vs ITO Ward-5(1), Kolkata

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Sriyans Enterprises Limited, filed its return of income for AY 2016-17 declaring total income at Rs. 1,89,510/-. The case was reopened due to high-value transactions, specifically an investment in mutual funds amounting to Rs. 2,96,50,000/- during FY 2015-16. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices and completed the assessment, making an addition of Rs. 47,00,000/- on account of unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), which was dismissed. The assessee then appealed to the Tribunal, arguing that the CIT(A) failed to discuss points of determination and reasons for the decision, and that the investment was duly recorded in the books of account.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
• 2. Whether the addition of Rs. 47,00,000/- as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act is valid.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• ITO, Ward -20(1) Vs. Prem Softech Private Ltd.

  A Bench, Delhi benchAY 2014-15Dismissed

• Ideacraft Eventures Private Limited vs. ITO, Gurgaon

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Global Educom Pvt. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• Padmakshi Chakraborty Vs ITO Ward-25(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata benchAY 2020-2021Allowed

• Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 10(1), R. No. 389A, 3rd Floor, CR Building, IP Estate, Delhi 110001 Vs. Jindal Poly Films Limited, 19th K.M. Hapur, Bulandshahar Road, P.O. Gulaothi, Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh 203408

  Delhi Bench 'C', Delhi benchAY 2012-13Dismissed

• DCIT vs. Shri Irfan S/o Sh. Meharban

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19 & 2019-20Dismissed