Skip to main content

SPS Automobiles, Bikapur, Hanumanganj, Prayagraj. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 (5), Prayagraj.

Case No: I.T.A. No.106/Alld/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench
Date: 30 Sep 2024

Parties Involved

appellantSPS Automobiles, Bikapur, Hanumanganj, Prayagraj.
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward-1 (5), Prayagraj.

Facts Summary

SPS Automobiles, a partnership firm engaged in the business of automobile dealership, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal was dismissed by the first appellate authority on the ground that the appeal in Form 35 was filed belatedly. The assessee argued that the delay was due to the negligence of their appointed lawyer, Mr. Dinesh Mishra. The second issue was regarding the addition of Rs. 54,17,992/- to the returned income by the CPC, Bangalore, based on incorrect reporting in the tax audit report (TAR) by the tax auditor. The assessee claimed that the figures were already reflected in the audited profit and loss account and were considered for taxable profits.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Delay in filing Form 35
  • 2. Addition of Rs. 54,17,992/- to the returned income

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning