Siddhartha Lal Trust vs DCIT

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Siddhartha Lal Trust, filed a return declaring income of Rs. 62.45 crore and claimed exemption under section 10(35) of Rs. 4.85 crore in respect of dividend income from units of mutual funds. The return was processed under section 143(1) on 25.02.2020, and the claim of exemption under section 10(35) was disallowed. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the intimation under section 143(1) on 16.03.2020. An application for rectification was also filed under section 154 before the Learned Assessing Officer on 10.08.2020. As the Learned Assessing Officer rectified the intimation via order under section 154/143(1) dated 11.08.2020, the assessee withdrew the appeal, which was dismissed as withdrawn by the Learned Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) via order dated 09.01.2024. Subsequently, the assessment was completed under section 143(3) at the returned income via order dated 31.12.2020. However, in the computation sheet, income was erroneously considered at Rs. 67.30 crore as per the original intimation under section 143(1), ignoring the subsequent rectification. The assessee filed an appeal on 04.03.2021 before the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the incorrect computation of income. However, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) disposed of the appeal on incorrect grounds by considering the grounds of the earlier appeal filed against the intimation under section 143(1)…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not considering the correct grounds of appeal and written submissions filed by the appellant.
• 2. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not adjudicating the appeal filed against the assessment order under section 143(3).
• 3. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not adjudicating the grounds relating to interest charged under section 234C of the Income Tax Act in the assessment order.
• 4. Whether the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not providing an opportunity of hearing through video conferencing as requested by the appellant.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Punit Malik vs. ACIT, Circle 70(1), Delhi

  Delhi Benches 'F', New Delhi benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Vimal Sureshbhai Mishra vs. ITO

  Ahmedabad bench

• VST Associates vs. ITO

  SMC BENCH: BANGALORE benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Ircon Davanagere Haveri Highway Limited Vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2022-23Dismissed

• Janki Wind Farm Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-3(2)(1), Ahmedabad

  Ahmedabad bench

• POOJA GUPTA VS. ITO, WARD 52(1), CH. 206-207, ANSAL SATYAM, NOIDA

  Delhi Bench ‘F’ benchAY 2016-17Dismissed