Shri. Vinod Kumar Singhal Vs. PR.CIT

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

This appeal was filed by the assessee, Shri. Vinod Kumar Singhal, against the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PR.CIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The PR.CIT had set aside the reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) and directed a denovo assessment. The reassessment was initiated under sections 147/148 of the Act based on information received from the Investigation Wing, Kolkata, regarding accommodation entries received by the assessee. The AO failed to examine an unsecured loan received from a shell company, which was a key reason for reopening the assessment. The PR.CIT also noted that certain penalties and contributions were not examined by the AO.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Validity of the reassessment order passed by the AO.
• 2. Jurisdiction of the PR.CIT to exercise power under section 263 of the Act.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Bhavna Impex vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

  Ahmedabad bench

• Indian City Properties Limited Vs Pr.CIT, Kolkata-2

  Kolkata benchAY 2020-2021Allowed

• Techno Electric & Engineering company Limited Vs. PCIT-2, Kolkata

  Kolkata benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Shri. Kumaraswamy Gangadharaiah Kallur Vs. DCIT

  Bangalore benchAY 2014-15Allowed

• Kachchh Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as Sanghi Infrastructure Ltd.) vs. The ITO

  Ahmedabad bench

• R.G. International Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Karnal

  Delhi Bench, New Delhi benchAY 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17Allowed