Shri Vinod Gangaram Patel vs. Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Shri Vinod Gangaram Patel, filed appeals against the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for assessment years 2012-13 and 2014-15. The appeals were consolidated due to common issues. The assessee argued that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was erroneous as the quantum addition was deleted by the Tribunal. The assessee also contended that the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer was defective as it did not specify the charge. The Tribunal found that the penalty notice was indeed defective and, in line with precedents, deleted the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
• 2. Defective penalty notice

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Mr. Prasanna Kantilal Mehta vs. The DCIT, Central Circle

  Pune bench

• Smt. Dayawanti Devi Vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench ‘B’ New Delhi benchAY 2005-06Allowed

• Sanjeev Kumar vs. Central Circle-14

  Delhi bench

• Noida Toll Bridge Company Limited

  Delhi bench

• N.G. Agrochemicals Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Raipur

  Raipur bench

• Roots Developers (P) ltd. Vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12 & 2010-11Allowed