Skip to main content

Shri. Sargod Venkatappa Gowda Subramanya vs. ITO

Case No: ITA No.2297/Bang/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Bangalore
Date: 1/16/2025

Parties Involved

appellantShri. Sargod Venkatappa Gowda Subramanya
respondentITO, Ward – 1, Chikmagalur

Facts Summary

The Income Tax Department observed that the assessee, Shri. Sargod Venkatappa Gowda Subramanya, had not filed a return of income under section 139(1) of the Act despite depositing cash in various bank accounts and undertaking purchase and sale of equity shares. A notice under section 148 of the Act was issued on 28.03.2023, which was served via email. Since there was no response, the Assessing Officer (AO) called for information from banks and observed various transactions. The AO added the enti

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned?
  • 2. Whether the appeal filed before the First Appellate Authority was rightly dismissed as defective?

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning