Shri S. Elambharathi vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Shri S. Elambharathi, an advocate, filed an appeal against the order of the Assessing Officer who made an addition of ₹3,66,29,000/- under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on seized materials from a search conducted on M/s SRS Mining and its partners. The seized materials were not in the handwriting of the assessee and did not contain complete information to establish a nexus between the payments mentioned and the assessee. The statement of Shri K. Srinivasulu, who maintained the seized materials, was retracted, and no other corroborative evidence was provided by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found that the seized materials were incomplete and did not provide adequate and reliable material to infer that the assessee received the unaccounted cash receipts.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the ld. CIT(A) justified in deleting the addition made on account of unexplained cash receipts on the basis of seized materials.
• 2. Whether the seized materials provided adequate and reliable evidence to establish that the assessee received the unaccounted cash receipts.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• ACIT, Central Circle -2, Trichy vs. Maragathamani Shanmugam, Ramasamy Moolimangalam Vaishnava Priya, Karuppanna Gounder Palaniappa Gounder Mariappan

• Income Tax Officer, Ward-16(3), New Delhi-110002 Vs MB Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd.

• Shri Brijesh Kumar Verma vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi benchAY 2016-17 and 2017-18Allowed

• Shayam Gupta vs. DCIT

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19 to 2021-22Partly Allowed

• Munesh Tyagi vs DCIT

• Shri Dheeraj Chaudhary vs The A.C.I.T.

  Delhi ‘F’ Bench benchAY 2015-16Partly Allowed