Shri Parthasarathy Balaji vs. ITO
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2017-18 arises out of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi on 15-02-2024. The Assessing Officer made additions of cash deposit of Rs.172.81 Lacs and Rs.54.60 Lacs, and denied housing loan interest deduction and Chapter VIA deduction. The assessee submitted partial details during appellate proceedings, and the CIT(A) directed the AO to verify and reduce the addition of Rs.172.81 Lacs. The addition of Rs.54.60 Lacs was confirmed, and the assessee is in further appeal. The tribunal accepted the prayer of the assessee's representative and restored the issue of the impugned addition of Rs.54.60 Lacs back to the file of the AO, with a cost of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited by the assessee.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Addition of cash deposit of Rs.172.81 Lacs
- 2. Addition of deposit of Rs.54.60 Lacs in SBN
- 3. Housing loan interest deduction
- 4. Deduction claimed under Chapter VIA
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Income Tax Appeal
Chennai benchDCIT, Central Circle-4(2), Kolkata Vs. Alom Poly Extrusions Ltd.
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2016-17 & 2017-18DismissedShri. Nanjappa Vijay Shankar Vs. ITO
Bangalore benchAY 2017-18AllowedShri Harish Kumar vs. ITO
Chennai benchNimshaskiya Madhyanik Shaley Karamchari Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. v/s Income Tax Officer
Nagpur benchThe MIG Co-operative Housing Society (Bandra East) Group IV Limited vs. Addl/JCIT(A)
Mumbai bench