Shri Habibullah Abbasali Chaudhary vs. The DCIT

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The case involves appeals and cross-appeals concerning the addition of unexplained loans and interest income by the Assessing Officer under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, Shri Habibullah Abbasali Chaudhary, had lent Rs.25 lakhs to Shri Rajpal Panghal and Rs.4,02,05,000/- to Shri Tanaji Jagtap in the assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007, respectively. The Revenue sought to revive the addition of loans and interest income amounting to Rs.1,55,00,000/- and Rs.52.50 lakhs, respectively, given to Shri Chetan Mehta. The assessee challenged the addition, arguing that the Revenue had discriminated between similarly situated persons. The case was remanded by the ITAT for reconsideration.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Validity of the assessment/additions made under section 153A of the Act.
• 2. Whether the assessee was granted an opportunity to cross-examine the loan recipients.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata vs. Vivek Gupta

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-18Partly Allowed

• Mahagun India Pvt Ltd Vs. The A.C.I.T

  Delhi bench

• Sunita Chaudhary Vs. The A.C.I.T

  Delhi ‘B’ Bench benchAY 2010-11, 2012-13, 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Bhagya Kalita vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1, Guwahati

  Guwahati bench

• Sh. Rajpal Singh Vs. Income Tax Officer, Bulandshahr

• Suresh Kumar Banthia vs DCIT, CC 4(3), Kolkata

  Kolkata benchAY 2016-17Dismissed