Skip to main content

Shivam Finance vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Case No: ITA No. 422/Kol/2023
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Kolkata Bench
Date: 21 Jun 2023

Parties Involved

appellantShivam Finance
respondentAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-49(1), Kolkata

Facts Summary

The assessee, Shivam Finance, filed its return of income on 27.10.2017 reporting total income of Rs.43,53,620/-. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS. The assessee challenged the issue of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, stating that the notice issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-49(1) was without jurisdiction and invalid since the declared income of the assessee for the relevant year was more than Rs. 30 lakhs and only the DCIT/ACIT had the jurisdiction over the case of the assessee. The case was dismissed in the first appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) for non-appearance by the assessee. The assessee is now in appeal before the Tribunal.…

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in passing the order ex-parte without allowing the appellant any proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard.
  • 2. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in passing the order when it was incumbent on him to deal with and decide each of the grounds raised in the appeal on its merits.
  • 3. Whether the order of the CIT(A) be modified and the assessee be given relief prayed for.
  • 4. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the assessment initiated and completed by AO since the notice u/ s. 143(2) issued by ITO Ward 49(1) was without jurisdiction and invalid.
  • 5. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by AO of Rs.6,20,000/- u/s 69A to the total income which was not justified.
  • 6. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by AO of Rs.6,20,000/- u/s 69A to the total income and charged tax u/s 115BBE which was unjustified and not in accordance with law.

2 further legal issues analysed in the full judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

2 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1•Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning