Skip to main content

Seema Pappu Yadav vs Income-tax Officer

Case No: ITA No.5483/Mum/2025
Court: INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH ‘G’, MUMBAI
Date: 1/7/2026

Parties Involved

appellantSeema Pappu Yadav
respondentIncome-tax Officer

Facts Summary

The assessee, Seema Pappu Yadav, filed an appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which upheld the order of the Income-tax Officer, Ward 31(3)(3), Mumbai. The Income-tax Officer had reopened the case under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and added Rs.52 lakhs as the purchase price of a property and Rs.14,96,900/- as a cash deposit in the bank account to the assessee's total income, as the source of these amounts was not explained. The assessee fail

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
  • 2. Whether the case should be remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

Precedents Relied Upon

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning