Saurashtra Cement Limited vs. The DCIT

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee company had incurred expenses on maintenance for a guest house at Mumbai amounting to Rs.7,71,084/-. The guest house was occupied by relatives of the ex-chairman of the company. The company had filed a suit in court regarding the ownership of the guest house but lost the suit. The AO disallowed the expenses as personal, non-business expenses. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who confirmed the AO's decision. The assessee then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the disallowance of Mumbai Guest House Maintenance Charges of Rs.7,71,084/- by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is correct.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• FCS Computer Systems S PTE Ltd Vs. ACIT, International Taxation- 1(3)(1), Delhi

• Veedol Corporation Limited Vs. DCIT, Circle 4(1)

• Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Noida vs. M/s Advant IT Park Private Ltd.

  Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi benchAY 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19Dismissed

• Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd. Vs. A.C.I.T., CC-2(4), Kolkata

• DCIT, Circle 73(1), Delhi vs. Canon India Private Limited

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2013-14Dismissed

• Ambuja Neotia Hotel Ventures Ltd. vs. DCIT, Circle 8(1)

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2014-15Partly Allowed