Skip to main content

Satender Kumar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi-110001

Case No: ITA No. 229/Del/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'SMC', New Delhi
Bench: Delhi Bench
Date: 2/10/2026

Parties Involved

appellantSatender Kumar
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward-28(1), New Delhi-110001

Facts Summary

The assessee received interest of Rs. 3,97,56,460/- on enhanced compensation from HUDA after the compulsory acquisition of his agricultural land. The assessee claimed the said interest as exempt under Section 10(37) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer accepted the explanation of the assessee and passed the assessment order without making any addition. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) revised the assessment order on the basis of an audit objection, holding that the i

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Correctness of assessing the interest component of land acquisition compensation under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Precedents Relied Upon

14 precedents cited in this judgement.

Judgment Outcome

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning