Saroj Bhonsle Naik vs. ITO
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Saroj Bhonsle Naik, did not file any return of income for the assessment year 2014-15. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) reopened the assessment based on substantial financial transactions undertaken by the assessee. The A.O. made several additions to the assessee's income, including unexplained investments and undisclosed income, totaling Rs.12,82,13,854/-. The assessee appealed against these additions, but the appeal was disposed of ex parte due to non-compliance. The assessee's counsel argued that the assessee, being an elderly lady unfamiliar with online procedures, could not comply with the necessary requirements.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the ex parte disposal of the appeal by the first appellate authority was justified?
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Girish Kshanlal Sharma Vs ITO, Ward-34(1), Kolkata
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2016-17Partly AllowedHarvest Agriculture Private Limited Vs. ITO Ward 2(1)(3)
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2019-20, 2021-22, 2022-23AllowedIslander Housing Project Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-3(4), Port Blair
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2020-21AllowedManju Tiwari vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Siliguri
Kolkata Bench benchAY 2023-24AllowedSanthanam Chinnasamy vs. ITO, Non-Corp Ward -6(1), Chennai
Vision Import Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward-10(2)
Kolkata benchAY 2011-12Allowed