Santosh Mahadeo Dalvi vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Santosh Mahadeo Dalvi, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2020-21. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the dismissal of the appeal without proper consideration, rejection of additional evidence, incorrect determination of total income, and incorrect determination of income from house property. The assessee argued that the additional evidences were not furnished due to the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal considered the submissions and found merit in the assessee's argument, admitting the additional evidences and restoring the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Dismissal of Appeal Without Proper Consideration
• 2. Rejection of Additional Evidence
• 3. Incorrect determination of total income
• 4. Incorrect determination of ‘Income from House Property’
• 5. Incorrect disallowance of interest on housing loan
• 6. Incorrect Reduction of Loss under the head ‘Income from House Property’

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Ramautar Saraf (HUF) Vs. ITO, Ward 59(3)

  Kolkata benchAY 2016-17Allowed

• Harbhajan Singh Chahal vs. Income Tax Officer

  Chandigarh bench

• Akshay Deepak Talim v/s Income Tax Officer (International Taxation)

• Parekh Marketing Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

  Mumbai Bench 'C' benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Shri Amar Charitable Trust vs Commissioner of Income Tax

  Jaipur bench

• ITA No. 4621/Del/2024 (AY 2011-12)

  Delhi Bench 'A', New Delhi benchAY 2011-12Allowed