Sanjay Bajpai vs. ACIT, 3(1), Raipur
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Sanjay Bajpai, a developer, filed his Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year 2013-14 on 02.04.2014 declaring income of Rs.35,36,070/-. The case was picked up for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer show-caused the assessee to explain the genuineness of customer deposits aggregating to Rs.21,94,38,719/-, to produce bills vouchers justifying the commission expenses and salary expenses, and to explain his failure to deduct tax on interest expenses of Rs.30,55,952/-. The assessee did not ensure any compliance during the assessment proceedings; therefore, the Assessing Officer taxed the entire customer deposits under section 68 of the Act and disallowed the entire commission expenses and 20% of the salary expenses. The Assessing Officer also disallowed the interest expenses under section 40a(ia) of the Act. The assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who allowed partial relief out of disallowances of commission expenses and salary expenses but upheld the addition of Rs.21,94,38,719/- under section 41(1) of the Act and the disallowance of Rs.30,55,952/- under section 40a(ia) of the Act. The appeal is before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Disallowance of Commission expenses of Rs.10,00,000/-
- 2. Disallowance of salary expenses of Rs.2,32,450/-
- 3. Disallowance of interest expenses of Rs.30,55,952/- under section 40a(ia) of the Act
- 4. Addition of Rs.21,94,38,719/- under section 41(1) of the Act
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Udai Parnami vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2), Jaipur
Jaipur benchBharti Airtel Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi Bench 'A', Delhi benchAY 2007-08 and 2008-09Partly AllowedThe Dakshin Dinajpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle 3
M/s. Unitech Acacia Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
Delhi benchGopal Dineshchandra Tulshan v/s Income Tax Officer
Nagpur benchAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-34(1), Civic Centre, E-2 Block, 2nd Floor, New Delhi Vs. Raj Bajwa, Ashok Vihar, 390, SFS Flats, Phase-IV, New Delhi
Delhi Bench ‘F’ benchAY 2017-18Dismissed