Sandeep Kumar Sethia Vs. ITO, Ward-44(2), Kolkata
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Sandeep Kumar Sethia, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 declaring a total income of Rs. 1,97,760/-. The assessment proceedings were completed under section 143(3) on 30.03.2014, assessing the total income at Rs. 2,34,660/-. During the assessment, it was noticed that the assessee had received cash totaling Rs. 2,59,42,000/- from 34 parties for brokering land/purchase deals with M/s Pushpanjali Pvt. Ltd, in violation of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, penalty proceedings under section 271D were initiated, and a penalty of Rs. 2,59,42,000/- was levied. The assessee appealed this penalty order before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi, who dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by this, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the order passed under section 250 is bad in law and on facts.
- 2. Whether the Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in law and on facts by failing to annul the penalty under section 271D.
- 3. Whether the Show Cause Notice dated 26.09.2014 was issued with an unreasonably short response time.
- 4. Whether the Ld. AO failed to provide a reasonable opportunity for the Appellant to demonstrate no violation of Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- 5. Whether Section 269SS applies only to loans and deposits and not to advance payments for the purchase of plots.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Precedents Relied Upon
6 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Sapna Jain vs JCIT Range-63
M/s. Doeguling Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society Ltd. vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 1, Sirsi.
'B' Bench : Bangalore benchAY 2017-18AllowedKamal Dwarkadas Gadodia vs Additional CIT 24(2), Mumbai
Mumbai Bench 'E', Mumbai benchAY 2010-11AllowedSanjeev Jai Narain Aeren vs. Addl.CIT
Delhi Bench benchAY 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19AllowedRaju Siddaiah vs. ITO
C'' Bench: Bangalore benchAY 2017-18AllowedShashi Bhushan Gupta vs. JCIT
Delhi Bench ‘G’ benchAY 2017-18Allowed