Samit Jain vs Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The case involves an appeal by the assessee, Samit Jain, against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-16, New Delhi, dated 26.03.2019, pertaining to the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee raised several grounds of appeal, including the initiation of reassessment proceedings, the CIT(A)'s comments on another person's appeal, and the justification of certain additions made by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was heard in the absence of the assessee, who had multiple opportunities to attend but failed to do so. The Assessing Officer had reopened the assessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and made several additions to the assessee's income. The learned DR supported the orders of the authorities below, and the learned CIT(A) affirmed the action of the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from the finding of the learned CIT(A) on the issue in question.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Initiation of reassessment proceedings
• 2. Additions made by the Assessing Officer

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Anup Transport Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18Allowed

• M/s. Terapanth Tracon Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT, Kolkata-II

  Kolkata bench

• ITA No.254/Hyd/2024

  Hyderabad bench

• CRS Infra Projects Limited vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(4), Delhi

  Delhi Bench ‘B’ benchAY 2011-12Allowed

• Ramasamy Kandasamy v. The ITO

  Chennai benchAY 2012-13Allowed

• Gita M Shah Vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre

  Mumbai benchAY 2013-14Allowed