Rockfield Mining Minerals Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The appellant, Rockfield Mining Minerals Private Limited, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Assessment Centre, New Delhi, which levied a penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-19. The penalty was levied due to the assessee's failure to make any worthwhile compliance before the Assessing Officer. The appeal was delayed by 310 days, but the delay was condoned considering the medical emergencies faced by the assessee's attorney. The assessee did not present any facts before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) either, leading to the confirmation of the penalty. The assessee challenged the penalty before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), mentioning the pendency of the quantum appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned?
• 2. Whether the penalty levied under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should be allowed?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Damyanti Atul Shah v/s Income Tax Officer, Ward – 20(1)(1)

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2013-14Allowed

• Global Coal and Mining Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Faceless Penalty Centre

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2020-21Allowed

• Kavita Agarwal vs. ITO, Ward-30(2), Kolkata

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2011-12Allowed

• Bina Ghosh vs Income Tax Officer

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2016-17Allowed

• Mr. Akil Abbas Rassai Vs. DCIT Circle-22(1)

  Mumbai benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• DCIT, Central Circle 2(3) Vs. Anil Kumar Kasera

  Kolkata benchAY 2017-18 to 2019-20Dismissed