Ritu Aggarwal vs. ITO, Ward 43 (4)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Ritu Aggarwal, filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 27.07.2024, for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was issued for limited scrutiny assessment due to credit card payments. An addition of Rs. 14,42,500/- was made by the Assessing Officer on the pretext of payments to credits. The assessee contended that the Assessing Officer did not supply any information to justify this addition and did not allow sufficient time to file the details. The appeal before the ld. CIT (A) was dismissed without an attempt to reach out to the facts of the case.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Assessing Officer uncovered the facts of the case before making the addition of Rs. 14,42,500/-.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Krishna Gopal Saraf Vs. The A.C.I.T

  Delhi ‘C’ Bench benchAY 2013-14, 2014-15Partly Allowed

• Manackraj Kamaraj VS ITO NCW 11(2) Chennai

• Dhairya Jyotish Dandwala vs The ITO, Ward-5(2)(2), Ahmedabad

  Ahmedabad bench

• Shri Amit Singh Kalsi Vs. The I.T.O

  Delhi ‘A’ Bench benchAY 2012-13, 2017-18Allowed

• Raj Kumar Kothari vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2022-23Allowed

• Raj Kumar Sharma vs. ITO, Ward 32 (5)

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12Allowed