Ravindra Madhukarrao Dhule v/s Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Ravindra Madhukarrao Dhule, has filed appeals challenging the orders passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2018–19. The assessee's counsel submitted that the orders were passed ex-parte and requested another opportunity to substantiate the case. The learned D.R. argued that the assessee had not appeared before the CIT(A) despite being given opportunities. The tribunal found that the CIT(A) had given sufficient opportunities but the orders were still ex-parte. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the orders and remitted the matter to the CIT(A) to adjudicate afresh after providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to be heard.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the orders passed by the CIT(A) were ex-parte?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• 3A Chemie Pvt. Ltd. v/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Nagpur bench

• Abdul Asif Abdul Kadir Abdul v/s Income Tax Officer

  Nagpur bench

• Nitin Prabhakar Vaidya v/s Income Tax Officer

  Nagpur bench

• Miltech Industries Pvt. Ltd. v/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Nagpur bench

• Hetalben P Kamdar vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1),Jamnagar

  Rajkot bench

• Bargoda Godar Gopal Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd.

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-2018Partly Allowed