PVR INOX Limited vs. Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, PVR INOX Limited, has filed three appeals against the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21. The primary grounds of appeal include the Commissioner's failure to adjudicate the appeal on merits, overlooking the merit-based submissions of the assessee, and not condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The assessee argues that the Commissioner erred in not considering the day-wise explanation for the delay in filing the appeal and in issuing an order with an incorrect Document Identification Number (DIN). The assessee requests the refund of taxes wrongly deducted and deposited at source.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not adjudicating the appeal on merits and issuing a non-speaking order.
• 2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
• 3. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in issuing an order with an incorrect Document Identification Number (DIN).

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Suchi Agarwal Vs. ACIT, Ghaziabad

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2022-23Dismissed

• Shri Mithilesh Kumar v. The Income Tax Officer

  Pune bench

• Apollo Education Trust, Bangalore Vs. ACIT

  Bangalore bench

• Tamil Nadu State Apex Fisheries Co-operative Federation Ltd. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward-19(1), Chennai

• Blue Star Building Materials Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

  Pune bench

• Purnima Shetty vs Income-tax Officer-26(2)(4)

  Mumbai bench