Prime Pearl Properties vs. ITO

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The appellant, Prime Pearl Properties, filed an appeal against the order passed by the National Identification Appeal Centre, Delhi, which dismissed their appeal under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant's appeal was dismissed despite the presence of a clerical error in the order, where an amount of Rs. 54,00,000 was wrongly added to the appellant's total income. The appellant had filed a rectification petition under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 2023, to correct this error, but the appeal was dismissed without addressing the error. The appellant argued that the order was not only procedurally incorrect but also substantively flawed.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the appeal was correctly dismissed by the National Identification Appeal Centre, Delhi?
• 2. Whether the National Identification Appeal Centre, Delhi, correctly applied Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Subrata Das vs. ITO, Ward-44(2), Kolkata

  Kolkata bench

• Triumvirate Sons Enterprises Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

  Mumbai bench

• Greenrev Ventures Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

  Patna bench

• Iskander Altaf Lalljee Vs. DCIT, Circle 52(1)

  Delhi bench

• Santosh Kumar vs. ITO, Ward-3(3), Aurangabad

  Patna bench

• Minal Sakpal vs. CIT(A)

  Mumbai bench