Skip to main content

Prakash Nagari Sahakari Pathosanstha Maryadit vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sangli

Case No: ITA No.1042/PUN/2026
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench
Date: 9/10/2026

Parties Involved

appellantPrakash Nagari Sahakari Pathosanstha Maryadit
respondentIncome Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sangli

Facts Summary

The assessee, Prakash Nagari Sahakari Pathosanstha Maryadit, filed an appeal against the order of the Learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2019-20 on 18.09.2024. The hearing was initially scheduled on 20.05.2026, but was adjourned multiple times due to non-appearance of the assessee. On 08.09.2026, the case was heard ex-parte. The assessee filed an affidavit explaining the delay in filing the appeal, citing reasons such as lack of updated guidance for ITAT remedy in Islampur, reliance on tax consultants, and the assessee's limited understanding of English and modern information technology.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the delay of 458 days in filing the appeal is justified?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

1 precedent cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Prakash Nagari Sahakari Pathosanstha Maryadit vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sangli | ITA No.1042/PUN/2026 |… | Opakhya