Platinum Properties vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in construction, filed appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Years 2015-16 and 2017-18. The appeals were dismissed ex-parte by the first appellate authority due to the assessee's failure to respond to notices and provide satisfactory reasons for the delay in filing the appeals. A survey was conducted at the assessee's premises, and discrepancies were found in property-related transactions. The Assessing Officer added back certain amounts as income under Section 43CA of the Act. The assessee's appeals were dismissed in limine without considering them on merits.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the assessee's appeals should be dismissed ex-parte due to delay in filing?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• M/s Nisarg Developers Vs ITO

  Pune bench

• Indira Bharat Gas Agency vs. ITO, Ward-1, Nanded

  Pune bench

• Sh. Bhupendra Meena vs. ITO

  Jaipur bench

• Seikh Kamaluddin

  Kolkata Bench benchAY 2017-2018Partly Allowed

• The Bhandara District Central Co–operative Bank Ltd. v/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

  Nagpur bench

• Chetan Nandlal Sangani vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

  Rajkot bench