Skip to main content

Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Case No: ITA No. 5461/Del/2024, ITA No. 5951/Del/2024, ITA No. 5999/Del/2024, ITA No. 6040/Del/2024, ITA No. 5979/Del/2024
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'I'
Date: 1/21/2026

Parties Involved

appellantPioneer India Electronics P. Ltd.
respondentDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(1), Gurgaon, Haryana
appellantMitsui & Co India P. Ltd.
respondentDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1), CR Building, Delhi
appellantRohde & Schwarz India P. Ltd.
respondentAssessment Unit/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 19(1), CR Building, IP Estate, New Delhi
appellantItron India P. Ltd.
respondentAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 10(1), CR Building, IP Estate, New Delhi
appellantMori Seiki India P. Ltd.
respondentDeputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1), CR Building, IP Estate, New Delhi

Facts Summary

These five appeals by five different assessees were taken up together as they involved identical issues. The assessees assailed the validity of the assessment orders on the ground of limitation as per the provisions of section 144C(13) read with section 153 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessees raised the legal issue challenging the validity of the final assessment order on the ground of limitation. The counsels for the assessees placed reliance on the decision in CIT vs. Roca Bathroom Products P Ltd. and furnished date charts to ascertain the period of limitation. The Department objected to the adjudication of these appeals, citing that the issue is sub judice before the Hon’ble Apex Court and that the Supreme Court has restrained the citation of certain judgments as precedents.

Decision in favour of

Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue

Legal Issues

  • 1. Whether the limitation for passing the final assessment order under section 144C(13) of the Act is to be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153 of the Act.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.

Precedents Relied Upon

8 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning
Pioneer India Electronics P. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. | ITA No. 5461/Del/2024… | Opakhya