Pallath Nafeesa vs. The Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, Pallath Nafeesa, owns agricultural land along with 16 co-owners. The land was acquired by the Government of Kerala, and compensation was received. Subsequently, the Principal Sub-Court of Kozhikode directed to pay additional compensation along with interest. The assessee received additional compensation of Rs. 1,64,36,212/- and interest on the same for Rs. 79,11,298/-. The assessee claimed that the interest received was in accordance with section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 and is part and parcel of the amount of additional compensation eligible for exemption under section 10(37) of the Act. However, the Assessing Officer treated the interest amount as income from other sources and made an addition to the total income of the assessee. The assessee appealed against this order before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee further appealed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the interest received on enhanced compensation shall be exempted under section 10(37) of the Act or chargeable to tax as income from other sources.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Shastri Lal Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Gurgaon

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Sh. Vijay Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer

• Dilbag Singh vs Income Tax Officer, Rohtak

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Sh. Deepak Kumar Yadav Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Rewari, Haryana

• Sh. Daulat Ram vs. Income Tax Officer, Rewari (JAO)

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed

• Anil Kumar Bhatia Vs Income Tax Officer

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2017-18Allowed