Palanisamy Navaladi vs. The Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

Palanisamy Navaladi, a tiles laying contractor, was assessed by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer found cash deposits in Navaladi's savings bank account and issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Navaladi did not respond, leading to the addition of the entire cash credit to his total income. Navaladi appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who restricted the addition to a certain extent. Navaladi further appealed to the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the cash deposits were from his business receipts and that he had offered profits under section 44AD of the Act. The Tribunal found that Navaladi's business was eligible for the provisions of section 44AD and accepted his offer of 10% profit on his business receipts.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the assessee's cash deposits were from business receipts?

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Srigadhi Ashvanth Kumar vs. ITO

  Hyderabad bench

• Nand Lal Popli, Vs. The D.C.I.T.

  Chandigarh Bench benchAY 2007-08, 2009-10Partly Allowed

• Mohd. Sami Alam vs. Income Tax Officer

  SMC Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2013-14Partly Allowed

• ITA 1951/BANG/2026

  Bangalore bench

• Mohammad Naushad Vs ITO Ward-32(1), Kolkata

  Kolkata benchAY 2016-2017Allowed

• T and T Infra Limited vs. ACIT, Circle – 7, Pune

  Pune bench