Skip to main content

Orient Overseas Container Line Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)

Case No: ITA No.6570/MUM/2025
Court: INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Date: 1/19/2026

Parties Involved

appellantOrient Overseas Container Line Limited
respondentDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)

Facts Summary

The assessee, Orient Overseas Container Line Limited, is a company incorporated under the laws of Hong Kong, engaged in the business of operating ships in international traffic. Its revenue comprises freight income and ancillary charges such as terminal handling charges, demurrage charges, etc. The assessee filed its return of income for the year under consideration, declaring a total income of Rs.1,32,79,99,310/-. The return was selected for scrutiny, and notices under section 143(2) and section 142(1) of the Act were issued. During the assessment proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee had collected GST in respect of ancillary charges but had not included it while computing the presumptive income under section 44B of the Act. The Revenue asked the assessee to show cause as to why the GST should not be treated as part of the turnover for the purpose of section 44B of the Act. The assessee submitted that the amount of GST collected by it cannot be added to the presumptive income computed under section 44B of the Act, as section 44B(2) of the Act covers amounts in connection with the carriage of goods, passengers, etc. The assessee placed reliance upon the decision of the Tribunal rendered in its own case for the preceding years, wherein the same addition was deleted.

Decision in favour of

Assessee

Legal Issues

  • 1. Including the Goods and Services Tax (GST) receipts for computation of deemed income under section 44B of the Act.
  • 2. Applicability of the provisions contained in section 115-JB of the Act.
  • 3. Short grant of credit of TDS and advance tax and non-grant of interest under section 244A of the Act.
  • 4. Erroneous levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A of the Act.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

7 precedents cited in this judgement.

Opakhya LogoOpakhya

AI-powered tax-litigation platform. Find precedents using natural language, draft submissions in minutes, and run your entire case repository from a single secure workspace.

© 2025 Opakhya. All rights reserved.

Core Features

Additional Features

  • Smart Comments
  • Export Options
  • Quick Copy
  • Analytics Dashboard
Version 2.0.1Last updated: October 2025
Powered by AI & Machine Learning