Om Prakash Saini (AY: 2009-10)
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The appeal was filed by Om Prakash Saini against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Gurugram, dated 22.03.2023, arising out of the Assessment Order passed by the DC/ACIT, Central Circle-2, Gurugram dated 30.09.2021 under Section 153A r.w.s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2009-10. The appeal was initially barred by limitation for 210 days due to the death of the assessee on 10.01.2023. However, the delay was condoned upon the application filed by the assessee’s son as the legal heir/legal representative. The assessee never appeared before the tribunal or the authorities below, leading to exparte orders being passed.…
Decision in favour of
Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the appeal is barred by limitation and whether the delay should be condoned.
- 2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the non-appearance of the assessee.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Revenue.
Similar Judgements
Pinakin Patel vs. ITO
Ahmedabad benchSourabh Kumar (AY: 2017-18)
SMC BENCH, DELHI benchAY 2017-18AllowedBalasubramaniam Sundaresan [Rep. by Legal Heir Umamaheshwari Sundaresan] v. The ITO, Non-Corporate Ward-22(6), Tambaram
PAWAN KUMAR VS. ITO, WARD-2(1)
Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12AllowedOm Prakash(Deceased) Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)
Pradeep Kumar vs. ITO
Delhi Bench benchAY 2009-10Allowed