Om Kiran Ispat Udyog vs. DCIT, Central Circle 1
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
The assessee, Om Kiran Ispat Udyog, a manufacturer of steel products, filed its Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year 2020-21 on 06.01.2021, declaring income of Rs.51,39,500/-. During the relevant year, the assessee was surveyed under section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and incriminating material was impounded. The Assessing Officer show-caused the assessee to explain unsecured loans received during the relevant year, which the assessee failed to do satisfactorily. Consequently, the Assessing Officer taxed the loan of Rs.80,90,000/- under section 68 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act. During the survey, cash transactions aggregating to Rs.3,47,69,810/- were seized from a commission agent, Shri Santosh Kumar Agrawal, who admitted to making these transactions on behalf of the assessee. The assessee admitted to making these purchases/sales but offered only profit of Rs.24,73,706/-. The Assessing Officer taxed the entire unaccounted sales aggregating to Rs.3,22,96,104/-. The assessee filed a belated appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Raipur, which was dismissed for non-condonation of delay.…
Decision in favour of
Assessee
Legal Issues
- 1. Non condonation of 114 days’ delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A);
- 2. Non admission of appeal for adjudication of the case on merit;
- 3. Taxability of Rs.80,50,000/- u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act;
- 4. Taxability of sum of Rs.3,22,96,104/- u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act.
- 5. Initiation of penalty proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Assessee.
Similar Judgements
Ashish Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-8, New Delhi
Delhi Bench ‘A’ benchAY 2018-19AllowedSantosh Laujari Gupta Vs ITO – 33(3)(3)
SMC Bench, Mumbai benchAY 2009-10Partly AllowedYogesh Pruthi Vs ACIT, Circle-43(1), New Delhi-110002
Rakesh Patel vs. ITO, Ward 60(8), New Delhi
Delhi benchBoyina Vinoda vs. Income Tax Officer
Visakhapatnam benchChander Bhan Yogesh Kumar Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-10
Delhi Bench 'C', Delhi benchAY 2018-19Allowed