Nirma Limited Vs. DCIT
Parties Involved
Facts Summary
Nirma Limited, a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and marketing consumer and industrial products, filed appeals against the assessment orders for the Assessment Years 2015-16 and 2016-17. The assessee claimed various deductions and adjustments, which were either allowed or disallowed by the Assessing Officer. The appeals were directed against the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the respective assessment years. The assessee and the revenue both filed cross-appeals and cross-objections against each other's appeals.…
Decision in favour of
Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue
Legal Issues
- 1. Whether the sales tax subsidy of Rs. 7,22,34,860/- is a capital receipt not chargeable to tax.
- 2. Whether the disallowance of excess depreciation on intangible assets is correct.
- 3. Whether the disallowance of product registration expenses is correct.
- 4. Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IA is correct.
- 5. Whether the corporate guarantee commission is income chargeable to tax.
- 6. Whether the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill arising out of amalgamation of Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. is correct.
Judgment Outcome
Decided in favour of Partly Assessee / Partly Revenue.
Precedents Relied Upon
6 precedents cited in this judgement.
Similar Judgements
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1(1) Chennai vs. FLSmidth Private Limited
M/s. S S Group (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1)
Delhi Bench ‘G’ benchAY 2015-16, 2016-17Partly AllowedAnshul Speciality Molecules Private Limited Vs. DCIT Circle 1(1)(1), Mumbai
Mumbai Bench benchAY 2020-21AllowedNEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD. V. DCIT, CIRCLE-18(1), NEW DELHI
Delhi benchThermo Fisher Scientific India Pvt. Ltd. v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
JCIT, Circle 21 (1) vs. Rajasthan Explosives Chemicals Ltd.
Delhi Bench benchAY 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17Partly Allowed