New Bharat Paints vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, New Bharat Paints, did not file its return of income for Assessment Year 2010-11. Consequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 31.03.2017. During the assessment proceedings, the AO received information indicating that the assessee’s turnover was Rs. 2,95,31,825/-. Due to non-compliance with notices for verifying the turnover, the AO estimated the profit at 5% of the total turnover, resulting in an addition of Rs. 14,76,591/-. The assessee did not avail of the nine opportunities provided to file submissions before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)), leading to an ex-parte order. Aggrieved by this, the assessee filed the present appeal.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the order passed by the AO is arbitrary and excessive.
• 2. Whether the AO was justified in completing the assessment without considering the written explanation filed by the assessee.
• 3. Whether the AO was justified in determining undisclosed income at Rs. 14,76,591/- without considering the assessee's status and credit transactions.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Similar Judgements

• Prabhatbhai Khodabhai Desai vs. Income Tax Officer

  Ahmedabad bench

• Gurpreet Kaur Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43(6), Civic Centre, New Delhi-110001

• Meenakshisundaram Balamurugan Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Dindigul

• Haywizz Havelock Island Resort Vs. ITO, Ward-3(4), Port Blair

  Kolkata ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata benchAY 2020-21Partly Allowed

• ACIT (OSD), Delhi Vs. M/s. Pandit Munshi Ram & Associates Pvt. Ltd

  Delhi Bench benchAY 2014-15Dismissed

• Balakrishnan Ramanathan vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Erode