Neem Tree Enterprise vs. The Income Tax Officer

Parties Involved

Facts Summary

The assessee, a partnership firm, did not file any return of income. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the assessee did not respond. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee received ₹48,30,000/- as rental income from Nathella Sampath Jewellery Private Limited and added this amount to the assessee's total income. The assessee challenged this decision before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who confirmed the addition. The assessee then appealed to the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the rental income was not received and should not be taxed in the current year.…

Legal Issues

• 1. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was justified in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of income from house property.

Judgment Outcome

Decided in favour of Assessee.

Precedents Relied Upon

Similar Judgements

• Sharda Chambers Premises Co-Op Society Ltd. vs. ACIT-17(3)

  Mumbai Bench benchAY 2013-14Partly Allowed

• Mr. Nateshan Sampath vs. DCIT

  C’’ Bench: Bangalore benchAY 2018-19Allowed

• Gaurav Dye House Vs. ITO

  Delhi 'E' Bench benchAY 2022-23Allowed

• Alisha Packaging Industries vs. ITO

  Ahmedabad bench

• Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench

  Mumbai bench

• The Dy. C.I.T Vs. Hart Travels and Real Estate Solutions

  Delhi bench